Want to Sue Metro? Too Bad, Maryland Court Rule (Sam Spital)

COMMENTARY BY PERSONAL INJURY LAWYER SAM SPITAL:

“In the DCist daily online news, it was reported on November 8, 2012, the Court of Appeals of Maryland, the highest court in the state, reversed jury awards in the lower courts and , therefore, held persons who are injured as a result of a slip and fall at the Metrorail station cannot sue the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority for what might be labeled violations of the standard operating procedures (negligence in the maintenance and/or cleaning of the grounds).The basis for the high court’s ruling was the 11th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution that gives sovereignty to states.

The claim of immunity does not preclude other lawsuits, such as vehicular accidents.”

 

 

 

Verdict reached but sealed in trial of teen accused in rapes of two girls

COMMENTARY BY SAM SPITAL, CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY:

‎”On October 26, 2012, the CBS online news reported a 17 year old boy was tried as an adult in the San Diego Superior Court and found guilty of rape, kidnapping and sodomy by force upon two girls who were friends taking a walk in a local park. These horrific and unspeakable crimes were committed in conjunction with a second defendant who faces a separate trial, and no doubt the reason the Judge sealed the verdict pending the outcome of that ongoing trial.

According to the Deputy District Attorney, the two teenagers were smoking marijuana when they saw the two girls, at which point one of the boys held a knife and used threats to force them to a secluded place where they were brutally and repeatedly attacked and subjected to a ‘30- to 40-minute series of sexual assaults that included every imaginable kind of rape.’ The police account reflected the defendant’s admission as well as the following statement: ‘(Expletive) happens… The body is weak when it sees flesh.’

The Defense Lawyer argued her client was not guilty and acted out of ‘impulse;’ he ‘cooperated after his arrest and admitted what he did.’ The article did not report and, therefore it is heart-wrenching there was no evidence of remorse, mitigation &/or recognition of wrongdoing of the savage behavior by the defendant who faces up to 325 years to life in State Prison. The reader is left wondering if either defendant has any redeeming quality having taken away the innocence of two girls who are and will be scared for life.”SAM SPITAL, CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY

Megan’s Law – Summary of California Law On Sex Offender

“The Medical Board of California on September 20, 2012, reported its investigation of a physician who practices OB-GYN in two neighboring communities in Los Angeles, the community of Northridge and Van Nuys, who was arrested on two felony counts of Sexual Penetration with a Foreign Object-Unconscious, a violation of California Penal Code section 289 (d).This section is used by the prosecution in cases in which the victim is unaware, did not know or perceive, or was not cognizant of the criminal act. A conviction of this offense requires the defendant to register with the Police or Sheriff as a sex offender for life pursuant to PC 290, as well as to provide specimens and samples. No other information or facts were disclosed. For Online Registration under Megan’s Law, see: https://meganslaw.ca.gov/registration/law.htm

If the facts disclose sufficient evidence of other illegal acts, it is still possible the prosecution may file additional charges, such as a violation of Business & Professions Code 729, which is sexual exploitation of a patient; as well as or in the alternative, a violation of Penal Code section 243.4 (c), which is Sexual Battery for a Professional Purpose. The latter is commonly charged when a doctor touches a patient without consent for his own sexual arousal &/or gratification and the contact was under the pretense it was for a professional purpose.

One needs to be mindful that a suspect who has been arrested is innocent until proven guilty. Moreover, a perusal of the internet revealed the physician has been licensed since 1998, graduated from USC School of Medicine, is Board Certified in Obstetrics and Gynecology; is affiliated with eight hospitals; is fluent in English, Farsi, Persian and Spanish; has had no prior Medical Board or hospital disciplinary action; and there are no reportable malpractice settlements or judgments.”

SAM SPITAL, CRIMINAL LAWYER

Mother Sentenced in Daughter’s Murder (Sam Spital)

“A mother was sentenced after her guilty plea to Second Degree Murder in the death of her nine year old daughter, as reported in the September 19, 2012 NBC digital edition of the news.

The story described a daughter who suffered an agonizing 17 months of continued strangling, kicks, burns and punches after she moved from the custody of her father to that of her mother. Her final days were a “slow and painful death.”

The mother was sentenced to 15 years to life in State Prison.  Without knowing more, it is a challenge for anyone to know and understand what was going on in the mother’s mind.

These homicides are the types of cases that a criminal attorney has to fully investigate in order to shape a defense, which does not mean one seeks to deny and/or excuse the behavior. Instead, the defendant’s attorney hopes to present to the court any mitigation and extenuating circumstances that exist when imposing punishment. For some, there could be no amount of evidence to persuade them to have mercy in a murder case. For others, there is a desire to understand the Defendant’s family history, her childhood, education, the victim, and finally the offender’s mental state so the punishment fits the crime. In other cases, the court looks only to the statutes and precedent in imposing a penalty.

While the child has lost her life, the mother will likely never escape the constant guilt of killing her daughter, a homicide that is unspeakable by nearly everyone’s account.”

SAM SPITAL, Criminal Defense Lawyer

 

Should California Cut Drug Possession Penalties to Cut Costs?

California lawmaker Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) has proposed a radical solution to overcrowding in the state’s many prisons and a corrections budget that has skyrocketed in recent years: cut the penalties for simple drug possession from a felony to a misdemeanor.

Vocal Speakers on Both Sides of the Debate

This move has some – like John Redman, director of public policy action group Californians for Drug Free Youth – concerned that this move is too radical for even the notoriously “laid back” state. He and Carla Lowe, another anti-drug advocate (and founder of Citizens Against Legalizing Marijuana) fear that lessened penalties will be viewed by the youth of the state as a free pass to try illicit drugs.

Proponents of the legislation are just as passionate, though. Senator Leno points out that increased penalties for drug-related crimes are doing nothing to deter their use or limit access to them. Just the opposite seems to be true: once someone has spent time in prison for a relatively minor drug possession offense, he or she risks being pigeonholed into a lower-income, lesser-chance-of-success lifestyle where career, housing and educational opportunities are rare.

Representatives of California’s branch of the American Civil Liberties Union, or ACLU, are also in favor of Senator Leno’s legislation. The ACLU views Leno’s proposal as an ideal balance of punitive heft (holding individual offenders accountable for their actions), rehabilitative access (providing opportunities for drug treatment), and fiscal responsibility (freeing up corrections department budgets for more hardened criminals).

Public Support Is Growing

A recent survey conducted by California Tulchin Research finds that a whopping 70 percent of voters surveyed around the state favor a decrease in punishment for possession of small amounts of marijuana, cocaine and other drugs. The poll found that even more – 87 percent – favored lesser punishments for drug-related offenses of all types if the defendant successfully completed a drug treatment program.

If voter support is any indication, there is a good chance that one day Californians will face lesser consequences for simple drug possession crimes. In the meantime, though, California takes all drug possession cases very seriously, punishing many of them with hefty fines and long jail sentences, so it is important that they be vigorously defended against. If you or a loved one is facing a California drug possession charge, contact a skilled criminal defense attorney in your area to learn more about protecting your legal rights.

Ratings and Reviews

BBB 10.0Samuel Eugene Spital
Samuel E. SpitalClients’ ChoiceAward 2021 Samuel Eugene SpitalClients’ ChoiceAward 2020
avvo rated 10/10 in Criminal Defense avvo rated 10/10 in Juvenile Law avvo rated 10/10 in Licensing
avvo rated 10/10 in Personal Injury Top ContributorAward 2012Samuel Eugene Spital Samuel Eugene SpitalReviewsout of 207 reviews